5.4 Application of these Techniques5 Laser Interferometric Techniques for 5.2 Signal Recycling

5.3 Fluctuations in Radiation Pressure 

A phenomenon which becomes increasingly important as the effective laser power in the arms is increased is the effect on the test masses of fluctuations in the radiation pressure of the light in the arms. From [33Jump To The Next Citation Point In The Article], for a simple Michelson interferometer with power P /2 in each arm, the power spectral density of the fluctuating motion of the test mass m induced by the fluctuations in the radiation pressure at angular frequency tex2html_wrap_inline1295 is given by

  equation239

where h is Planck's constant, c is the speed of light and tex2html_wrap_inline1321 the wavelength of the laser light. In the case of systems with cavities in the arms where the number of effective reflections is approximately 50, fluctuations in the amplitude of the light arise immediately after the beamsplitter where vacuum fluctuations enter into the system. These are then enhanced by the power build up effects of the optical cavities. In this case

  equation244

Evaluating this at 10 Hz, for powers of around tex2html_wrap_inline1355  W after the beamsplitter and masses of 30 kg, indicates an amplitude spectral density for each mass of tex2html_wrap_inline1357 . Given the target sensitivity of the detector at 10 Hz in Fig.  3 of approximately tex2html_wrap_inline1359 which translates to a motion of each test mass of close to tex2html_wrap_inline1313 it is clear that radiation pressure may be a significant limitation at low frequency. Of course the effects of the radiation pressure fluctuations can be reduced by increasing the test masses, or by decreasing the laser power at the expense of deproving sensitivity at higher frequencies.

It should be noted that as discussed in [33, 22, 23] and [64] for a simple Michelson system, the optimisation of laser power to minimise the combined effect photon shot noise and radiation pressure fluctuations allows one to reach exactly the sensitivity limit predicted by the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, in its position and momentum formulation. An extension of this analysis to a system with cavities in the arms has been carried out by one of the authors [50] with the same result and it seems likely to be true for the more complicated optical systems using power and signal recycling also.



5.4 Application of these Techniques5 Laser Interferometric Techniques for 5.2 Signal Recycling

image Gravitational Wave Detection by Interferometry (Ground and Space)
Sheila Rowan and Jim Hough
http://www.livingreviews.org/lrr-2000-3
© Max-Planck-Gesellschaft. ISSN 1433-8351
Problems/Comments to livrev@aei-potsdam.mpg.de