RE: alta vista and virtualvin.com

Louis Monier (monier@pa.dec.com)
Mon, 3 Jun 1996 11:14:47 -0700


John, no objection. I think the basic assumption, maybe too basic and
worth repeating, is that there are sites out there generating pages on
the fly with no robots.txt file. That is the source of the problem.

--Louis

>----------
>From: John D. Pritchard[SMTP:jdp@cs.columbia.edu]
>Sent: Monday, June 03, 1996 9:04 AM
>To: robots@webcrawler.com
>Subject: Re: alta vista and virtualvin.com
>
>
>i have always thought that one builds a site with a couple of fairly
>static
>pages under which the dynamic stuff is accessable. this provides a way
>to
>index the site. the static pages are pointed to by robots.txt. i
>don't
>see an unsolved problem here, but i'm not a heavy shtml, et al, user --
>rather a java fan.
>
>the w3 has an html3.2 instead-of-cookies, btw. admittedly if robots
>ignore
>robots.txt and become mired in informational quicksand then the server
>would either need to internally maintain somekind of cookies scheme
>(which
>is anti statlessness) or use cookies or OBJECTs to keep anyone,
>including
>dumb machines, out of quicksand.
>
>-john
>
>