>
> It should be noted that the 2.0 standard is still in flux and is liable to
> change without warning
[...]
Understood.
> It was thus said that the Great Art Matheny once stated:
> >
> > I am uncertain about how my version 2.0 robot should interpret the
> > following robots.txt directive:
> >
> > Robot-version: 2.0
> > Disallow: /images
> >
> > Should it retrieve "/images/huge.gif" or not?
> >
> Actually, that's an ambiguous condition.
[...]
Exactly my point! I have not been following this debate very well, but I
read the November 11 revision of the draft, and I think it is a
constructive plan. I conclude, however, that there are philosophical
deadlocks yet to be resolved.
-- LLLL LLLLL LLLLLL Arthur Matheny LIB 612 LL LL LL LL LL Academic Computing University of South Florida LLLLLL LLLLL LL matheny@usf.edu Tampa, FL 33620 LL LL LL LL LL 813-974-1795 FAX: 813-974-1799 LL LL LL LL LL http://www.acomp.usf.edu/_________________________________________________ This messages was sent by the robots mailing list. To unsubscribe, send mail to robots-request@webcrawler.com with the word "unsubscribe" in the body. For more info see http://info.webcrawler.com/mak/projects/robots/robots.html