Chapter 13 in: Which DNA Marker for Which Purpose?  Final Compendium of the Research Project Development, optimisation and validation of molecular tools for assessment of biodiversity in forest trees  in the European Union DGXII Biotechnology FW IV Research Programme Molecular Tools for Biodiversity.  Gillet, E.M. (ed.).  1999.  URL http://webdoc.sub.gwdg.de/ebook/y/1999/whichmarker/index.htm

Isolation and sequence analysis of oak and spruce cDNA clones


M. Berenyi1, S. Fluch1, K. Hohl1, K. Burg1*, R. Schubert2, R. Riegel2, G. Müller-Starck2

1 Austrian Research Centers, Life Sciences, Department of Biotechnology, 2444 Seibersdorf, Austria
2 Technical University of Munich, Faculty of Forest Sciences, Section of Forest Genetics, Am Hochanger 13, 85354 Freising, Germany

*Corresponding author: Email:  kornel.burg@arcs.ac.at


Introduction

The adaptation of individuals as well as populations to the environment is not well understood because of the lack of knowledge of the genes involved in these processes.  The highly developed and so far preferentially used marker systems, such as RAPDs, AFLPs, nuclear SSRs, and rDNA ITS, mainly represent repetitive regions of the nuclear genome, with the rDNA markers being further confined to the nucleolar organizer regions (NOR).  These neutral markers are ideal for assessing the genetic diversity as well as evolutionary relationship of populations, since the distribution of their variation is presumably not influenced by selective forces.  Close linkage of any important genes controlling adaptive characters with molecular markers currently available can only be a fortuitous and rare occurrence.  There is therefore a need to develop additional DNA polymorphisms representing genes involved in adaptive processes; such non-neutral markers could indicate the differentiation of populations on the basis of selective and adaptive features.  The recently developed DNA microarray technology could facilitate the discovery of genes modulated by environmental changes (Schena et al., 1995), thus identifying genes involved in adaptation processes.  However, this technology requires the availability of cDNA (complementary DNA) sequences to be tested for differential expression under various environmental conditions.  Complementary DNA sequences are the representatives of the messenger RNA (mRNA) transcripts of the expressed genes.  It is also known that useful sequence variation for polymorphic DNA markers can often be found at non-translated parts of mRNA sequences (Gil et al. 1997). Therefore, here we describe the isolation and sequence characterisation of cDNA clones randomly selected from cDNA libraries of oak and spruce.

Material and Methods

Tissue culture

Suspension cultures of a locally established Quercus petraea embryonic line were maintained in P24 medium.  For osmotic treatment the medium was diluted four times with distilled water.  Preliminary experiments showed that cell growth was not significantly influenced under such nutrition conditions for several weeks (not shown).

Isolation of total RNA from plant cells

The modified method of Cathala et al. (1983) was used as follows: 9.2g oak tissue culture was homogenized in liquid N2 until it became fine powder.  30ml of lysis buffer (5M guanidium monothiocyanate dissolved at 60°C, 10M EDTA, 50 mM Tris pH 7.5, 8% ß-Mercaptoethanol) were added to the frozen samples and carefully mixed during melting (the sample was divided into aliquots to be able to handle the volume).  Then the samples were centrifuged at 10,000 rpm. for 20 min. Afterwards the supernatant was transferred into sterile 34ml Beckman centrifuge tubes, four volumes of 7M LiCl were added and incubated at 4°C overnight (or for a minimum of 12 hours).  The samples were centrifuged 90 min. at 14,000 rpm at 4°C in a Sorvall S34 rotor.  The pellets were resuspended in 5ml 3M LiCl and centrifuged again for 60 min. at 15,000 rpm. 3ml solubilisation buffer (0.1% SDS, 1mM EDTA, 10mM Tris pH7.5) were added to dissolve the pellets.  The samples were frozen again and vortexed during melting.  Then the RNA was extracted with an equal volume of phenol and then phenol-chloroform. Subsequently 0.1 volume of 3M NaAc (pH 4.9) was added and the chloroform extraction was repeated.  The samples were precipitated with 2.5 volumes of ethanol (abs.) at -70°C for 2 hours, then centrifuged for 20 min. at 10,000 rpm and washed with 80% Ethanol (chilled to -20°).  The pellets were dried under vacuum and dissolved in a total volume of 400 µl solubilisation buffer.  The RNA concentration was determined by photometer at 230 and 260nm wavelengths, and finally 2µg was checked on a 1.5% sterile agarose gel in 1x TBE.

Poly A+ RNA purification

The poly A+ RNA was purified by Dynabeads (Dynabeads Oligo(dT)25) according to the manufacturer's specifications.

Library Construction:

The oak cDNA libraries were constructed with Clontech's SMART® PCR cDNA Library Construction Kit according to the instructions of the user manual.  The parameters of the libraries are presented in Table 1.

The Norway spruce cDNA library originates from photomixotrophic suspension cells of Picea abies (L.) Karst.  PolyA+ RNA was isolated after treatment with a fungal elicitor (Galliano et al., 1993).

DNA sequencing

The selected clones were sequenced on an ABI 373XL sequencer, using the ABI Prism's BigDye® Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction Kit with the following modification: Instead of 8µl Terminator Ready Reaction Mix only 4µl plus 4µl halfBigDye (Sigma) were taken, and 4 instead of 3.2 pmol of each primer were used.  Nearly all identified clones were sequenced to full length on both DNA strands by an oligonucleotide walking strategy.

BLAST search

The obtained oak DNA sequences were compared directly to DNA sequence databases by the BLAST 2.0 search system (NCBI).  They were also translated to putative amino acid sequences and then compared to the Swissprot database. The Norway spruce nucleotide sequences were compared to all main public databases using the network WU-BLAST similarity search server of the Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research.

Results and discussion

Oak

One untreated and two osmotic shock induced cDNA libraries have been established from Quercus petraea tissue culture cells.  The initial clone number of the libraries was about 3 x 106 each (Table 1) which allows the isolation of cDNA clones representing low copy number mRNA species as well.  The average length of inserts in the cDNA clones varied from 792 to 881 basepairs.  In the present study fifty randomly selected clones were picked from each library and their insert size established. Clones containing inserts shorter than 500 bp were discarded.  The remaining 82 clones were sequenced mostly to full length.  Sixty out of the 82 clones proved to contain an appropriate 3' end of the mRNA represented by the presence of the poly A tail (Table 2).  The analysed clones have an average insert size of 0.9 kb.  The putative identity of 27 clones (45%) could be established by the BLAST sequence comparison system. As far as protein function is concerned, it was possible to identify six ribosomal protein sequences (three 60S /clones 6, 31, 70/ and 40S /clones 21, 75, 76/ each) possibly representing abundant mRNA species.  Two heat shock (clones 43, 168) and two lipid transfer proteins could also be identified (clones 82, 92).  The rest of the putative proteins represent single proteins of a different function (Table 2).

Norway spruce

One-hundred-thirty cDNA clones were sequenced from the fungal elicitor-induced spruce cDNA library.  Based on significant homologies with known genes of other organisms, 30% of the spruce clones were identified as housekeeping genes and putative stress-related genes, encoding a broad spectrum of metabolic pathways.  Using the sequence data, PCR primer pairs were designed in order to amplify expressed sequence tag (EST) sites in Picea abies.  For the 18 trees tested, all primer pairs yielded PCR bands matching the size exactly predicted from our cDNA data.  In the case of 11 PCR primer pairs, polymorphic amplification patterns were seen in diploid bud DNA extracts. Seven EST markers detected co-dominant inheritance by comparing the banding pattern obtained from the diploid bud-DNA extract to the corresponding haploid megagametophytes.  The remaining markers revealed polymorphic bands in the megagametophyte samples, confirming the existence of multigene families. Our results indicate that the number of alleles, which were identified at each locus within a population of 100 trees, varies between two and five.  Such markers are suitable tools for the verification of genetic variation within populations and corresponding forest reproductive material.  Furthermore, such markers may be utilised in the monitoring of viability selection and genetic loads such as inbreeding.

Conclusions

  • We could establish three cDNA libraries of oak representing approx. 3 x 106 clones each.
  • So far we sequenced and characterised 60 oak cDNA clones, and the identity of 27 clones could be postulated.  This represent 45% of the clones sequenced so far.
  • One-hundred-thirty Norway spruce cDNA clones have been sequenced.
  • Seven EST sites showed co-dominant inheritance in the 18 Norway spruce individuals tested.

  •  
    References

    Cathala G et al. (1983) A method for isolation of intact, translationally active ribonucleic acid.  DNA 2(4): 329-339.

    Galliano H, Cabane M, Eckerskorn C, Lottspeich F, Sandermann H, Ernst D (1993) Molecular cloning, sequence analysis and elicitor-ozone-induced accumulation of cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase from Norway spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karst.]. Plant Mol. Biol. 23: 145-156.

    Gill RW, Hodgman TC, Littler CB, Oxer MD, Montgomery DS, Taylor S, Sanseau P (1997) A new dynamic tool to perform assembly of expressed sequence tags (ESTs). Computer Applications in the Biosciences 13(4): 453-457.

    Schena M, Shalon D, Davis RW, Brown PO (1995) Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray. Science 270: 467-470.



    Library
    Treatment
    Average insert length bp
    Initial clone number
    Partially sequenced clones
    Fully sequenced clones
    Control
    Non-treated
    864
    3.2 x 10 6
    15
    1
    1H
    Hypotonic 1 h
    792
    2.5 x 10 6
    9
    -
    2H
    Hypotonic 2 d
    881
    3.2 x 10 6
    32
    3
    Table 1: Parameters of the oak cDNA libraries



         
    Insert length*
    Sequenced length
    Library
    Clone 
    Putative identity
    kb
    3' 
    5' 
    Total
    Untreated
    2
    Anther-specific proline-rich protein
    1.3
    1420
     
    1420
    "
    5
    Initiation factor 5A-2
    0.9
    902
     
    902
    "
    6
    60S Acidic ribosomal protein P2
    0.7
    622
     
    622
    "
    10
    Enolase
    1.7
    525
     
    525
    "
    11
     
    0.6
    511
     
    511
    "
    12
     
    1.8
    386
    531
    917
    "
    16
     
    0.5
    390
     
    390
    "
    21
    40S Ribosomal protein s15A
    0.5
    302
     
    302
    "
    22
    Cyclin A
    1.0
    897
     
    897
    "
    25
     
    0.7
    554
     
    554
    "
    31
    60S Ribosomal protein L7
    0.9
    901
     
    901
    "
    39
    Vacuolar ATP synthase
    1.1
    977
     
    977
    "
    41
     
     0.7
    597
     
    597
    "
    43
    Mitochondrial heat shock 70 kd protein
    1.1
    1027
     
    1027
    "
    47
    G10 protein
    1.0
    507
     
    507
    "
    49
     
    0.6
    502
     
    502
    1H
    103
     
    0.7
    665
     
    665
    "
    104
     
    0.5
    453
     
    453
    "
    107
     
    0.8
    677
     
    677
    "
    109
     
    1.4
    1286
     
    1286
    "
    110
    Aspartic proteinase precursor
    0.9
    799
     
    799
    "
    118
     
    0.8
    636
     
    636
    "
    120
     
    0.5
    497
     
    497
    "
    121
     
    1.1
    521
     
    521
    "
    124
     
    0.5
    458
     
    458
    2H
    53
    Biotin carboxyl carrier prot. (BCCP)
    1.20
    1164
     
    1164
    "
    54
     
    0.56
    430
     
    430
    "
    55
    Small nuclear Ribonucleoprotein E homologue C29
    0.65
    569
     
     569
    "
    63
     
    1.40
    501
    531
    1032
    "
    64
     
    0.73
    733
     
    733
    "
    67
     
    0.85
    752
     
    752
    "
    69
     
    1.10
    1040
     
    1040
    "
    70
    60S ribosomal protein L18A
    0.80
    752
     
    752
    "
    71
    Nuclear pore complex protein (NUP358)
    0.75
    664
     
    664
    "
    73
    Histon H4
    0.72
    617
     
    617
    "
    75
    40S Ribosomal prot.s19
    0.93
    846
     
    846
    "
    76
    40S Ribosomal prot.L22
    0.78
    715
     
    715
    "
    77
     
    0.93
    875
     
    875
    "
    79
     
    0.78
    671
     
    671
    "
    80
     
    0.55
    430
     
    430
    "
    81
     
    0.85
    794
     
    794
    "
    82
    Non-specific lipid-transfer prot.(LTP)
    0.79
    638
     
    638
    "
    85
     
    1.20
    1139
     
    1139
    "
    87
     
    0.58
    426
     
    426
    "
    89
     
    0.83
    904
     
    904
    "
    92
    Non-specific lipid-transfer prot.1 (LTP1)
    0.80
    641
     
    641
    "
    94
     
    1.30
    1273
     
    1273
    "
    95
    Cystationine gamma-lyase
    0.62
    520
     
    520
    "
    96
    Cysteine protease inhibitor
    0.65
    541
     
    541
    "
    97
    Protein kinase
    1.00
    923
     
    923
    "
    98
     
    0.80
    679
     
    679
    "
    99
    RNA pol. II 13.2 kD polypeptide
    0.75
    635
     
    635
    "
    100
     
    1.10
    227
    533
    760
    "
    164
     
    0.65
    551
     
    551
    "
    166
     
    0.80
    695
     
    695
    "
    168
    18.5 kD class I heat shock prot.
    0.80
    641
     
    641
    "
    172
    Tubulin beta-2/beta3 chain
    1.70
    582
    592
    1174
    "
    173
     
    0.85
    854
     
    854
    "
    174
    Pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 component
    1.00
    1138
     
    1138
    "
    175
     
    0.90
    894
     
    894

    Table 2: List of the Quercus petraea EST clones.  * Approximate insert length of the cDNA clone established by agarose gel electrophoresis.

    © Institut für Forstgenetik und Forstpflanzenzüchtung, Universität Göttingen, 1999