> > There is a feature in many word processors - Word comes to mind - as part of the
> > "Grammer Check" section. After executing a grammer check, Word displays statistics about ...
> Andrew Wrote
> Nice idea, if you think people will always use good english grammar and
> sentences for their web pages,
And do they want indexing anyway? <g>
> but often in things like a list or an index there
> is no need for good grammar and point form works far better for many things.
But there is need for structure which can rate as highly as grammar
> (When was the last time you saw "Click here to go to the ________ page."?)
Today, yesterday, the day before and the day, after. Stupud
instructions abound. It's sadly everywhere. Even on my toothpicks
(instructions:insert between teeth, ang wiggle from left to right!)
> For example,
> look at the search results from any robot such as webcrawler, they are very useful
> but there is little english grammar and few if any complete sentences. Or any
> companies web page, it probably has a series of links at bottom that reads
> "Technical Support; Ordering; On-line Catalog", again not much of a sentence. Also
But does it say ?
"Technical Support; Ordering; On-line Catalog",
"Technical Support; Ordering; On-line Catalog",
"Technical Support; Ordering; On-line Catalog",
"Technical Support; Ordering; On-line Catalog",
>As far as developing something to ignore large blocks of random or
> repeditive text, good idea.
> Andrew
>
agreed
Alan
-- "Just when you thought is was safe to go back to Burgers.." ...**.....:..*.*....^...*...*..*.*....*............*.*..*.. ...*..".. M y G o d ......*..:..*..*....*...*...:*.. .^.*..*... It's F u l l o f S t a r s ..*.:....*.. .*.... http://www.visionaries.co.uk/zine/madcows.hts .:.*..