I'm getting that feeling. I suspect that I was a little optimistic or
muddle-headed when I read the original docs...
>the Wilbur dtd allow to use both NAME and HTTP-EQUIV to define the same
>metainformation
>ex: <meta http-equiv="keywords" name="keywords" content="a ,b ,c">
It seems a somewhat contrived solution.. backwards compatable only
through the lack of syntax checking in earlier browsers perhaps :-)
Maybe the question should be whether robots ought to recognise
<meta http-equiv="keywords" content="a ,b ,c">
<meta name="keywords" content="a ,b ,c">
as providing the same information...
Regards,
Martin Kiff
mgk@webfeet.co.uk